Robert O. Young, CPT, MSc, DSc, PhD, Naturopathic Practitioner
Arianna Love, Naturopathic Practitioner
Is There A Safe & Effective Broad-Spectrum Solution to All the Pollutions?
“My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge: because thou hast rejected knowledge, I will also reject thee, that thou shalt be no priest to me: seeing thou hast forgotten the law of thy God, I will also forget thy children.” ~ Hosea 4:6
Rockefeller Medicine
Around 1900, the science world was getting excited about new “petrochemicals” and the ability to create a variety of new compounds from oil. Some of the first products derived from petrochemicals were plastics.
In 1908, modern medicine was established by the Rockefeller’s and dubbed “Allopathy”. The Rockefeller’s created the business of modern medicine which has always been about poisoning people, Eustice Mullen explains.
This is the Definition of Allopathic Medicine According to the NIH:
“A system in which medical doctors and other health care professionals (such as nurses, pharmacists, and therapists) treat symptoms and diseases using drugs, radiation, or surgery.”
The Rockefeller Institute for Medicine, founded in 1908, marked the advent of the re-creation of synthetic versions of natural cures. Prior to 1908, every place of healing in America, Europe and the world, used only ancient traditional natural medicinal cures. Every hospital was a “Homeopathic Hospital”. Most of these magnificent buildings were converted into mental health asylums where a system of torture and electric shock was established to “cure” mental illness.
John D. Rockefeller created the oil industry and used it to crush traditional medicine in order to enslave people. They also financed the Eugenics movement. One of the perks of modern medicine is depopulation.
“Everyone knows that the infamous Roe v. Wade opinion legalized abortion, but almost no one knows that legal abortion was a strategy by eugenicists, as early as 1939, to “genetically improve” the population by “reducing” it.”
In the book, “Rockefeller Medicine Men: Medicine and Capitalism in America”, authored by E. Richard Brown, he tells the hidden story of the financial, political, and institutional manipulations whereby a diverse and eclectic range of traditional healing modalities available to the North American public was summarily canceled and pared down to a singular style of medicine that would become the predominant medicine of the Western world and a major force in global medical culture during the 20th century. This was brought about largely by the collaboration of the American Medical Association, the philanthropies of Andrew Carnegie and John D. Rockefeller, and the development of a revolutionary curriculum by the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine. Brown documents the story of how a powerful professional elite gained virtual hegemony in the Western theatre of healing by effectively taking control of the ethos and practice of Western medicine. E. Richard Brown describes how, in 1905, the American Medical Association’s new Council on Medical Education funded by Carnegie and Rockefeller commenced serious activity. They employed the services of Abraham Flexner who proceeded to visit and “assess” every single medical school in the US and Canada. Within a short time of this development, medical schools all around the US began to collapse or consolidate. By 1910, 30 schools had merged, and 21 had closed their doors. Of the 166 medical schools operating in 1904, 133 had survived by 1910, and 104 by 1915. Fifteen years later, only 76 schools of medicine existed in the US and they all followed the same curriculum.
The 1910 Flexner Report laid the foundations of the modern medical system, dubbed “Rockefeller medicine” (Allopathy)
Since 1910, corporate interests have established near total control of the medical field, both though pharmacology and through their impact on medical education.
In 1935, vitamin C became the first vitamin to be artificially synthesized in Switzerland. Rockefeller saw a big opportunity with the possibility that vitamins and medications could be developed from petroleum. He saw the chance to control and monopolize multiple industries at once: petroleum, chemical and medical. Petrochemicals were ideal from a business perspective because they could be patented, owned and sold for high profits.
Today, the petrochemicals in plastics are causing a slew of illnesses including neurodevelopmental disorders, diabetes, chronic respiratory disease, and cancer, which have increased between 28% and 150% between 1990 and 2019. Petrochemicals in microplastics are also rapidly reducing fertility in males in particular, and polluting our environment. Please also read more here, here, and here.
The first pharmaceutical drug was an arsenic named Salvarsan. That’s right, an ARSENIC POISON!
DEATH is an all-to-common side effect of pharmaceutical drugs which is only logical when you administer poisons internally.
The following research paper demonstrates the many deaths of people around the world, most of them children, who were fatally poisoned during the first mass medication experiments with Rockefeller’s Allopathic health. The paper is entitled, Toward Responsibility in International Health: Death following Treatment in Rockefeller Hookworm Campaigns, 1914–1934.
What is EDTA?
EDTA is synthesized on an industrial scale acid or poisons using 1, 2-diaminoethane (ethylene diamine), formaldehyde, water and sodium cyanide.
Ethylene diamine induced acute and subchronic toxicity in lab animals, also allergic hypersensitivity. The liver and kidneys are target organs of ethylenediamine, where they simply stop working.
Absorption of large amounts of formaldehyde via any route can cause severe systemic toxicity, leading to metabolic acidosis, tissue and organ damage, and coma, according to the CDC.
Exposure to sodium cyanide can be rapidly fatal. It has whole-body (systemic) effects, particularly affecting those organ systems most sensitive to low oxygen levels: the central nervous system (brain), the cardiovascular system (heart and blood vessels), and the pulmonary system (lungs), according to the CDC.
EDTA is an industrial poison!
The textile industry required a chelating agent to remove calcium during textile processing and this led to the synthesis of polyamino-carboxylic acids, one of which was EDTA.
A patent was filed for EDTA in Germany in 1935, for industrial chemical use. EDTA is a synthetic acid effectively used to clean boiler rooms in nuclear power plants. In 1945, Franz Munz obtained a US EDTA patent in 1945. In 1947, EDTA was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as a food additive in “low doses” because it’s a forever chemical and a preservative.
There are two different types of EDTA approved by the U.S. FDA. In 1953, Edetate calcium disodium also known as Calcium EDTA (marketed under the trade name Calcium Disodium Versenate registered) was approved for the treatment of lead poisoning. Three years later, in 1956, a related EDTA compound, Edetate disodium, was also approved for clinical use. This compound, also known as Disodium EDTA, has been marketed under the trade names Disotate (registered) and Endrate (registered). The essential difference between these two compounds is that Calcium EDTA's structure has an incorporated Ca super(2+) moiety while Disodium EDTA does not. The use of the latter compound, Disodium EDTA, has been associated with life-threatening and fatal hypocalcemia.
EDTA RESEARCH TRIAL DEATHS
An EDTA trial (Sloth-Nielsen et al., 1981) on the possible antiatherogenic effect of EDTA with 6 patients, showed clinical signs of potentially lethal hypocalcemia from abnormally low calcium levels caused by EDTA.
Another EDTA chelation human trial in 2003-2005 resulted in DEATHS due to hypocalcemia.
A 2006 EDTA chelation trial also resulted in DEATHS due to hypocalcemia.
There were several DEATHS reported from cardiac arrest due to lethal hypocalcemia in EDTA trials in 2006 and 2008 and (Brown, Willis, Omalu, & Leiker, 2006; Baxter & Krenzelok, 2008), from calcium deficiency inducing alterations in the brain, and osteoporosis, which causes the bones to become brittle.
In 2008, a clinical trial with EDTA chelation on autistic children also proved fatal, resulting in DEATHS of children.
A 2007 EDTA chelation study proved KIDNEY FAILURE in humans.
Decades of clinical studies demonstrate that EDTA treatment is associated with severe, life-threatening adverse effects, as Science Direct explained in 2016.
“It should be emphasized that EDTA treatment is associated with severe, life-threatening adverse effects.
EDTA for Cardiovascular Disease DEBUNKED
Many allopathic specialists tried to popularize the use of EDTA for chelation, to no avail. In the 1980s, Richard Casdorph, a practicing cardiologist, claimed improvements in ejection fractions of the heart and in cerebral blood flow with EDTA chelation therapy in several articles.
McDonagh, Rudolph, and Cheraskin published about 30 articles documenting various positive effects of EDTA chelation. This group wrote articles showing no problems with kidney function in patients treated with EDTA according to the published protocol.
At the same time, conventional cardiologists wrote several editorials against EDTA chelation.
So the American Medical Association called for studies to see if chelation worked. The American Board of Chelation Therapy in 1983 was formed to certify doctors who give the therapy. It was later called the American Board of Clinical Metal Toxicology. ACAM also certified doctors who took its workshop on chelation therapy and passed its written and oral examinations.
The Great Lakes College of Clinical Medicine, later called the International College of Integrative Medicine (ICIM), was formed in 1983 to teach and do research on chelation and other integrative therapies. After complex negotiations, in the late 1980's Walter Reed Army Hospital agreed to do a randomized clinical trial on EDTA chelation therapy, but part way through the study it was suddenly discontinued for unknown reasons.
However, in a paper by Seely, Wu, and Mills, (2005), a systematic review of published articles in this field was undertaken. The authors concluded that the best current available evidence did not support the therapeutic use of EDTA chelation therapy in the treatment of cardiovascular disease. Similar results have been reported in review papers by Shrihari, Roy, Prabhakaran, and Reddy (2006) and Crisponi et al. (2015).
While a 2002 EDTA large randomized clinical trial “showed benefit”, smaller studies were inconsistent.
In the 1990s, the Federal Trade Commission filed a complaint against ACAM for making a claim in a brochure that chelation was effective for vascular disease. ACAM submitted almost 100 articles in support of the claim, but the FTC insisted that a large randomized trial was required to make that claim. ACAM finally gave up after spending a million dollars in legal fees and signed a consent order saying they would not make such a claim anymore, based on the evidence at that time.
In conclusion, our study shows that in a population of stable, largely asymptomatic coronary artery disease patients with prior myocardial infarction, use of EDTA chelation therapy did not produce a measurable change in health-related quality of life over 2 years of follow-up.
A slew of other adverse events such as lacrimation, nasal congestion, mucocutaneous lesions, glycosuria, hypotension, and ECG abnormalities (DISEASE OF THE HEART AND LUNGS) have also been reported as well as allergic reactions (Wax, 2013) to EDTA.
Prolonged treatment with calcium EDTA gives rise to depletion of magnesium and trace-metal depletion, the most marked being due to the excretion of zinc. Zinc depletion destroys your cells’ ability to absorb nutrients and leads to diabetes.
A 2015 study entitled, Quality of Life Outcomes with a Disodium EDTA Chelation Regimen for Coronary Disease: Results from the TACT Randomized Trial concluded with this statement:
“In conclusion, our study shows that in a population of stable, largely asymptomatic coronary artery disease patients with prior myocardial infarction, use of EDTA chelation therapy did not produce a measurable change in health-related quality of life over 2 years of follow-up.”
Severe kidney damage from EDTA chelation therapy was reported in a (Nissel 1986) trial. In a very short period of time, EDTA causes kidneys to shut down in complete failure.
A study from 2015 suggests EDTA chelation for myocardial infarction with “modest” benefits to cardio health.
However, I would suggest that the moderate benefits of this study were due to the high doses of vitamin C administered.
A 2017 study on EDTA chelation for atherosclerosis and Miocardial Infraction concluded:
“Unsubstantiated claims of chelation therapy as an effective treatment of atherosclerosis should be avoided and patients made aware of the inadequate evidence for efficacy and potential adverse effects, especially the harm that can occur if used as a substitute for proven therapies.”
In a 2018 EDTA trial it was concluded:
“These results… are not sufficient to support the routine use of chelation therapy for treatment of patients who have had an MI (Miocardial Infraction)”.
A study from 2023 entitled, Chelation Therapy Associated with Antioxidant Supplementation Can Decrease Oxidative Stress and Inflammation in Multiple Sclerosis: Preliminary Results proved a flop with two participants discontinuing their trial participation.
EDTA for Lead Poisoning DEBUNKED
EDTA has also been touted as a treatment for lead poisoning. Because of its adverse effects, calcium EDTA was replaced by DMSA in the treatment of lead poisoning (Aposhian et al., 1995) in 1995. CaEDTA has also been used for the treatment of cases with manganese toxicity, but the result was neurotoxic symptoms resembling PARKINSONISM (Andersen, 1999).
A 2004 trial showed that EDTA actually REDISTRIBUTES LEAD TO THE BRAIN after acute or chronic lead exposure (Andersen, 2004).
Another trial proved adverse effects in 5 patients receiving EDTA at an outpatient chelation clinic in 2002, and all patients experienced gastrointestinal and musculoskeletal symptoms.
Oral exposure to EDTA (2002) had produced adverse reproductive and developmental effects in animals. EDTA did not make it past the animal or human trials, so why are medical doctors using it in humans?
A 2002 EDTA trial was performed on humans as a test for “chelation” therapy by a chelation clinic, demonstrating adverse events in 5 out of 5 patients.
Additionally, EDTA is a persistent organic pollutant (POP). In that case, each intake would only be partially excreted, while the remaining chemicals build up in the body and produce cell death. And long-term exposure to calcium disodium EDTA creates toxicity and kidney damage.
EDTA is not an approved pharmaceutical drug. It was Covid Emergency approved by the FDA under an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA), just like the modified RNA (modRNA) Covid-19 vaccine nanotechnology.
The National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (.gov) makes it clear that the use of EDTA chelation for heart disease has not been approved by the FDA.
Today, there are medical doctors and health practitioners who have been touting EDTA as an “antioxidant” when it is not. In fact, it’s an acidic poison and an oxidant.
A licensed medical doctor should know whether EDTA is an oxidant poison or an antioxidant. Not knowing this and
inducing a health risk to the patient
is not an acceptable excuse.
EDTA is an oxidant when used internally. The studies that refer to EDTA as an “antioxidant” are in vitro lab studies, not in vivo (inside the body).
EDTA is used to preserve cell specimens for chemistry lab work because it prevents blood coagulation and oxidation of cells in a petri dish where it’s used for diagnostic purposes. This is the kind of “antioxidant” the studies are referring to. But when you infuse EDTA synthetic acid into the human body, it acts as an oxidant poison.
EDTA, will not decoagulate the blood in vivo (inside the body). But I can see how people who do not read peer-reviewed literature could be deceived and manipulated by those using EDTA synethic acid.
For example, a study entitled, “Comparative study of the antioxidant capability of EDTA and Irganox”. EDTA is a preservative used in laboratories to preserve cells for scientific lab research. EDTA prevents the oxidation of cells in a petri dish. Oxygen causes cells to deteriorate, but labs need them to last longer for research purposes. When used inside the human body (in vivo), it’s a different story. Then, EDTA acts as an oxidant acidic poison, not an antioxidant. So this has a very different meaning.
One of the well documented and widely known adverse events from EDTA “chelation” is DEATH, according to Mount Sinai.
Other serious side effects of EDTA that have been reported include low blood sugar, diminished calcium levels, headache, nausea, dangerously low blood pressure, kidney failure, organ damage, irregular heartbeat, seizures, or even death.
EDTA is NOT a Detox Agent!
Again, EDTA is an oxidant that degrades cells whereas genuine antioxidants repair cells.
Saul Green, Ph.D., and Wallace I. Sampson, M.D. wrote in great detail about the Implausibility of EDTA Chelation Therapy, stating:
“EDTA chelation effectiveness is implausible; (2) the preponderance of evidence shows ineffectiveness; and (3) EDTA augments oxidative reactions involving iron instead of inhibiting them, resulting in increased likelihood of production of oxygen free radicals rather than neutralization of them, as claimed.”
EDTA is a Precurser to Cellular Transfection
The Rockefeller Institue of Medicine has done clinical research on EDTA. One particular study entitled, Studies of Cell Deformity from 1967, shows that cells will degrade from EDTA exposure, which also induces “deformation” on their surfaces. The trial demonstrated that EDTA stops cellular synthesis of calcium. They learned that calcium is bound to anionic sites at the cell periphery, some of which are located at the cellular electrokinetic surface.
Due to Rockefeller’s research, EDTA is now used in electrophoresis which is a laboratory technique used to separate DNA, RNA or protein molecules based on their size and electrical charge. An electric current is used to move the molecules through a gel or other matrix, according to the National Human Genome Research Institute.
In agarose gel electrophoresis, EDTA is added for chelating the magnesium ions which are cofactors for DNA nucleases.
Hence, activity of DNA nucleases that may be present is inhibited, and “DNA is protected from degrading”. This is why EDTA is an effective transfection agent because it dissolves parts of your DNA, preserving cells for lab research in vitro.
Gel electrophoresis using EDTA is routinely used for detection and size analysis of proteins and nucleic acid.
DMSO is used with EDTA in this process. This destruction of cells makes transfection (gene editing) of cells easier using CRISPR-Cas9 which splices and dices the genome in vivo, as this study explains entitled, “Inhibition of CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoprotein complex assembly by anti-CRISPR AcrIIC2”.
EDTA was found to be genotoxic in laboratory animals. A study from 1983 demonstrates that EDTA induces gene mutations and chromosomal breakage, meaning that genetic mutations will be passed on your offspring, affecting generations to come, according to this Genetic Toxicology of EDTA study from 1983.
Calcium chelate of EDTA (CaEDTA) “chelation” has shown teratogenic effects (Catsch & Harmuth-Hoene, 1976), which are central nervous system depression and peripheral neuropathy. EDTA produced abnormalities in pups of rats removed by cesarian section on day 21 of the study. Increases in several abnormalities (cleft palate, adactyly or syndactyly, abnormal rib or abnormal vertebrae) were observed with increased doses of CaEDTA.
EDTA improves transfection of embryonic stem cells lines (hESC) in cells, according to the NIH.
According to a peer reviewed paper from the NIH, EDTA is a precursor to cellular transfection.
“We found that chemically abrading the differentiated CACO-2 human intestinal epithelial cell layer by a trypsin and EDTA pretreatment (before the use of detergent-like transfection reagents) dramatically improved transfection efficiency in this polar, differentiated model. Although this treatment did improve the transfection efficiency, it also induced leakiness in the epithelial barrier by both opening tight junctional complexes and by creating holes in the cell layer because of low-level cell death and detachment. Thus, this approach to enhance the transfection efficiency of polar, differentiated cells will be useful for assessment of the effect of the transfected/expressed protein on (re)formation of an epithelial barrier..."
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. Fetal Bovine Serum for human transfection also uses EDTA.
An NIH study entitled, “Kinetic Basis for DNA Target Specificity of CRISPR-Cas12a” reveals that EDTA enables rapid binding to DNA during gene editing (transfection).
Another study entitled, “Improved genome editing by an engineered CRISPR-Cas12a” explains:
“CAS12a is an RNA-guided, programmable genome editing enzyme found within bacterial adaptive immune pathways. Unlike CRISPR-Cas9, Cas12a uses only a single catalytic site to both cleave target double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) (cis-activity) and indiscriminately degrade single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) (trans-activity).”
According to the study, “A DNA loading buffer of 45% formamide and 15 mM EDTA, with a trace amount of xylene cyanol and bromophenol blue…” is used to transfect the human genome.
EDTA is a transfection agent used with CRISPR-Cas9 to edit the human genome.
Does EDTA actually dissolve graphene?
The answer is NO!
EDTA oxidant is used to reduce graphene to Reduced Graphene Oxide (RGO) form.
Graphene is reduced by oxidation. Rather than dissolving graphene, EDTA reduces graphene to Graphene Oxide nanoparticles otherwise known as Graphene Quantum Dots.
Graphene oxide is more toxic than graphene, as documented in the article entitled, “Graphene Oxide The Vector For Covid-19 Democide”.
I will emphasize again that Graphene Oxide Quantum Dots cannot be seen with a dark field compound light microscope! Claims that EDTA is detoxing graphene from the human body with microscopy is unscientific and absolutely false!
EDTA Chelation for Graphene Nanocomposites
EDTA chelation is NOT effective in removing metals from the human body. It's actually a different kind of chelation that’s used to create electrochemical sensors (biosensors) when combined with GRAPHENE!
EDTA serves as a connecting mediator between NiHCF (Graphene Oxide Nanoparticles and Nickle) and graphene nanosheets. EDTA is used with metal nanoparticles, metal oxides, graphene, carbon nanotubes, and quantum dots to stabilize the technology for a more uniform distribution throughout the body.
A Science Direct paper entitled, “Highly sensitive ascorbid acid sensors from EDTA chelation derived nickel hexacyanoferrate/graphene nanocomposites” reveals that EDTA is used to create Graphene/Nickel, AA sensor nanocomposites.
“EDTA chelation stragey” is used for the “homogeneously distrubuted" NiHCF” (Nickel hexacyanoferrate composite) on graphene sheets. EDTA residue-supported pyramidal and spherical nanoparticles of NiHCF deposited on graphene sheets is used to create biosensors for the formation of Graphene/Nickel hydrogels.
The graphene hydrogel nanocomposite sensors (Gr/NiHCF) are used as externally controlled biosensing tools. They tell us it’s used to test for ascorbic acid, but the application of this technology is for “human life” as well as for industrial use. See link here.
Graphene oxide/Lauric acid nanoparticles are modified using EDTA. Lauric acid nanoparticles is suggested as a “prospective drug carrier” for oral nanoparticle-mediated sustained drug delivery (timed release technology) used for the removal of Pb(II) ions (lead). However, studies show there are cytotoxic results.
Another study entitled, “Improved genome editing by an engineered CRISPR-Cas12a” demonstrates how EDTA improves transfection and modification of the human genome.
Once graphene is reduced to graphene oxide, due to its small particulate size, you can no longer identify it using a dark-field microscope.
There are several doctors using dark-field microscopy at low magnigication and without using scanning, transmission or bright field microscopy confirmed by directed energy x-ray spectroscopy, which are the only instruments that can be used to measure the presence of GON and Quantum Nano Dots.
What is Happening With EDTA Infusions?
Some doctors are creating a metal-EDTA complex that stabilizes and strengthens the graphene-based nanotech weapon system and enables it to spread more readily throughout the body, for human transfection. They use “light and sound healing techniques” to activate the delayed release technology before administering EDTA infusions.
EDTA is an acidic poison that dissolves DNA. It's used to prime the cells’ DNA for transfection. EDTA disrupts the surface of skin cells so that other forever chemicals, micro plastics and graphene oxide can penetrate more easily and CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing technology can work more efficiently.
The NIH describes EDTA’s enhanced cellular transfection:
“Flow cytometric analysis using an enhanced green fluorescent protein vector showed a significantly increased transfection efficiency of EDTA method compared to standard enzyme method. In addition, the EDTA approach maintained stable cell viability and recovery rate of hESCs after transfection.”
Another study published in Research Gate, confirms that EDTA increases cellular transfection, along with using hydroxychloroquine.
Graphene Oxide Quantum Dots (GOQD-HA) nanocomposite use EDTA for tissue-specific delivery of Metformin, an anti-diabetic drug otherwise known as insulin.
Is There a Solution to ALL These Pollutions?
A Scientific Peer Reviewed Research Paper
Superior forever chemicals, heavy metals, nano and micro plastics, radioactive elements and nano and mircro technology chelation, exists with redox molecules in a nano colloidal system found in a unique patent-pending product called, MasterPeace Zeolite Z developed by Human Consciousness Support company.
The following is the 'abstract' for a peer-reviewed scientific research paper titled,
"MasterPeace™ Zeolite Z™ Pilot Study Found to be Safe and Effective in Removing Nano and Micro Forever Chemicals, Heavy Metals, Micro Plastics, Graphene and Aluminum Found in the Human Body Cells and Fluids"
Authors:
Robert Oldham Young, CPT, MSc, DSc, PhD, Naturopathic Practitioner
Caroline Mansfield, Naturopath, Dip.Nat, mANP, mGNC
.
Robert Oldham Young, CPT, MSc, DSc, PhD, Naturopathic Practitioner
Caroline Mansfield, Naturopath, Dip.Nat, mANP, mGNC
Abstract
Zeolite, specifically clinoptilolite zeolite, has long been used for environmental cleanup and animal-feed supplementation, due to its unique crystalline structure and ion-exchange properties that allow it to effectively trap and remove toxins.[1] Over the past quarter century, its
application has extended to human consumption as a detoxification agent.[2]
In the nano-colloidal[3] product called MasterPeace™, Zeolite Z™ by Human Consciousness Support™ company, a patent-pending combination of nano-sized clinoptilolite zeolite and sea plasma[4], known as Zeolite Z™, isutilized.[5]
[Scanning & Transmission Electron Microscopy Reveals the Nano Hexagonal Multi-demensional Construct of
MasterPeace™ Zeolite Z™ - Copyright Dr. Robert O. Young & Hikari Omni Publishing, 2024]
To test the efficacy of MasterPeace™ Zeolite Z™ in removing heavy metals[6], forever chemicals[7], micro plastics[8], micro and nano graphene and aluminum[9][10] and other toxic compounds from the body cells and fluids, a study was conducted involving three test subjects, two adult females and one adult male. The objective was to determine the safety and efficiency of MasterPeace™ Zeolite Z™ in detoxification of these micro and nano toxins.
The study employed an intracellular fluids toxicity test of the blood with baseline results collected before starting the regimen, followed by tests at 35 days and 90 days. The test subjects took the MasterPeace™ Zeolite Z™ natural product daily at a specified dosage of 5 drops under the tongue, twice a day.
The intracellular fluid toxicity test[11] targeted highly toxic compounds and elements that were believed to be present in the body but had not been previously tested. This study aimed to evaluate the baseline of these toxic compounds and how effectively MasterPeace™ Zeolite Z™ could chelate and remove these toxic compounds from the body. The specific toxic compounds and elements tested are listed below.
The sea plasma in MasterPeace™ Zeolite Z ™ is known for its detoxification and remineralization properties [1], enhancing the products’ overall effectiveness. This
ingredient also supports the removal of toxins while replenishing essential minerals in the body.[4]
The study aimed to test the combined effects of both nano-sized clinoptilolite zeolite and sea plasma in promoting overall detoxification and health. The findings from these tests provide insights into the comprehensive detoxification
capabilities of MasterPeace™ Zeolite Z™, measuring its impact on reducing the toxic burden in human blood.[12][13][14]
Introduction
Background: The Human Consciousness Support™ Company and their product MasterPeace™ ZeoliteZ™, was developed within the last two years, as an all-natural detoxification product potentially capable of removing toxic substances from the body.
MasterPeace™ Zeolite Z™ has been refined with the input of numerous scientific minds, focusing not only on the optimization of the nano-sized zeolite but also on the innovative combination of clinoptilolite zeolite with inland sea plasma at a pH of 8.3 and a oxidative reduction potential (ORP) value of -90mV.[15] This unique formulation, known as MasterPeace™ Zeolite Z™, is designed to operate at a pH of 8.3 and -90mV, which enhances its efficacy. According to Human Consciousness Support Company™ literature [5], MasterPeace™ Zeolite Z™ is a synergistic blend of natural ingredients which is claimed to be effective natural product or nutraceutical available for detoxification, targeting and removing a wide range of toxic nano and micro compounds from the human body.[5]
Rationale: To address a critical gap in our understanding of the presence and detoxification of specific toxic micro and nano toxic compounds in the human body. In today’s world, individuals are constantly exposed to myriads of toxic micro and nano toxic substances, many of which are known to be cytotoxic, genotoxic and bio magnetic toxic to the human blood, cells and tissues.[1]
However, there is limited accessibility and availability of testing for these compounds in many countries, making it difficult for them to obtain baseline measurements of these harmful and toxic agents in their bodies.
By testing for specific toxic compounds in the blood of three subjects, this study aims to fill a crucial knowledge gap.
Establishing baseline levels of these toxic substances is essential for understanding their prevalence and potential impact on health. Additionally, evaluating the efficacy of the MasterPeace™ Zeolite Z™, which combines nano-sized colloidal clinoptilolite zeolite with sea plasma (known as Zeolite Z™, in removing known micro and nano toxins is equally important. The findings from this study provides valuable insights into the safety and effectiveness of this detoxification approach, potentially offering a viable solution for individuals seeking to reduce their toxic burden and improve their overall health.
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to obtain information based on blood.[11] We wanted to evaluate the toxic burden on the human body. We chose initially five data points being graphene oxide (2D Nano)[16] , polyethylene (PE)[17], polypropylene (PP)[18], perfluoro octane sulfonate-acid (PFOS)[19][20][21][22] and perfluorooctanoic-acid (PFOA)[19][20][21][22]. At the 35-day mark we included five more compounds which were aluminum[23], glyphosate[24], iron[25], lindane[26] and phosgene[27].
Methodology
Study Design: This pilot study employed a pre-test, post-test design to evaluate the efficacy of the intervention.
Setting: The pilot study was conducted in a real-world home environment, were the participants took the product for 90days. The controlled aspect of the study involved the blood collection, by a phlebotomist from the participating subjects at designated intervals.
Participants: Participants were selected to include both COVID-19 vaccinated[28] and non-vaccinated individuals of European descent. There were three test subjects, female aged 57, male aged 57, and female aged 60, respectively.
Intervention: The product being tested for its safety and efficacy in chelating and removing toxic foreignmicro and nano toxins in the body cells and fluids was MasterPeace™ Zeolite Z™ manufactured and distributed by Human Support Consciousness Support™ company.[5] Following the baseline test, participants took a dosage of five drops twice daily, administered under the tongue sublingually. The duration of the study was 90 days.
Laboratory Test: iEC – Cellular Toxin Examination. Inadequate detoxification or increased exposure to toxic substances can cause them to accumulate in the body fluids and body cells.
These toxins can impair cellular processes such as energy supply through the respiratory chain in the mitochondria or attach to DNA and form a DNA adduct.[29] With the iEC examination (iEC for intracellular electrical capacity), the intracellular amount of toxins in the lymphocytes canbe determined and possible exposure can be detected at an early stage.[12]
Control Group: There was no control group in this initial pilot study.
Outcome Measures: The primary outcome measure was the intracellular toxicity test of the blood.[11] We started the study by testing each subject for 5 substances and their tolerance levels, including graphene oxide (2D Nano)[16] , polyethylene (PE)[17], polypropylene (PP)[18], perfluorooctane sulfonate-acid (PFOS)[19][20][21][22] and perfluorooctanoic-acid (PFOA)[19][20][21][22], as our baseline before intervention as seen in Chart 1 below:
Chart 1
At the 35 day mark we included an additional 5 substances to be tested for each subject including aluminum[23], glyphosate[24], iron[25], lindane[26] and phosgene[27].
as seen in Chart 2 below:
Chart 2
Data Collection: An outsourced phlebotomist was employed to take venous blood samples from each test subject, with 3×4 ml vials collected at baseline, 35 days, and
90 days.
Statistical Analysis: Blood samples of participating subjects were measured for toxic compounds at nanomoles per liter (nmol/L) with the following reference ranges:
- Tolerable: 0 to 14,999 nmol/L
- Borderline: 15,000 to 29,999 nmol/L
- High: 30,000 to 44,999 nmol/L
- Very High: 45,000 to 65,000 nmol/L
Four separate sensors are used in the measuring equipment at the third-party lab to obtain four values.[11] Measurements included Arithmetic mean of values (AM) 1 to 4 and Mean Absolute Deviation (MAD).[11]
Results
Participating Subject Flow: All three subjects enrolled in and successfully completed the study.
Baseline Characteristics: Each subject voluntarily agreed to take part in the study and confirmed adherence to the study protocol. To prevent any potential bias orinfluence on the study outcomes, participants were not informed of their individual results until the conclusion of the study. This approach was intended to avoid any anxiety or actions, such as taking additional detox products, that might arise from learning about high toxic levels found in the blood.
Participating subjects were instructed to maintain their usual diet and lifestyle throughout the study. They were explicitly advised not to engage in any additional supplement, diet, or lifestyle detox protocols during the study period.
Primary Outcomes: The baseline blood tests revealed that all test subjects had predominantly high and very high levels of toxic substances in their blood as shown in Chart 1 and Chart 2 above.
As the study progressed, the 35-day blood tests indicated a reduction in these levels, with most falling into the borderline and tolerable ranges as seen in the baseline, 35 days and 90-day testing for all 10 toxic substances that reduced to the tolerable and borderline ranges of <300 shown in the following charts 3, 4 and 5 below.
By the 90-day mark, the blood tests showed that all subjects’ toxin levels had further decreased, with all measurements falling within the borderline and tolerable ranges.
Chart 3
CR Baseline, 35 days and 90 days.
Chart 4
SZ Baseline, 35 days and 90 days.
Chart 5
AD Baseline, 35 days and 90 days.
Notably, none of the participating subject’s toxin levels had reverted to the high or very high ranges as seen above in Charts 3, 4 and 5.
Secondary Outcomes: Fluctuations were observed within the tolerable andborderline ranges for some of the toxic compoun ds, which may have been attributed to environmental exposure through daily lifestyle activities.
However, it is significant tonote that while taking MasterPeace™ Zeolite Z™, none of the test subjects’ levels of any toxic compounds reverted to the high or very high ranges as seen in Chart 6 below:
Chart 6
Overview Table All Data Points. Status 90 Days.
Endpoint Data Analysis for Wellbeing Improvement
The following graphs represent endpoint data exclusively focused on wellness improvement outcomes. At the end of the study the test subjects reported positive effects from taking MasterPeace™ Zeolite Z™.
Participant #1 noted experiencing a significant cognitive boost, while Participant #2 described a heightened sense of joy, connection and intuition in life. Additionally, participant #3 reported feeling increased energy and less joint pain.
For categories where participants did not provide specific feedback, N/A (Not Applicable) has been used to indicate that no data was available for those participants in those categories. N/A does not imply a lack of improvement but rather a lack of specific feedback in that area.
Adverse Events: There were no negative side-effects or adverse reactions observed during the 90-day study for any subject.
Discussion
Interpretive Results: The objective of this study was to establish baseline levels of micro and nano toxins within the human body and to evaluate the efficacy of the MasterPeace™ Zeolite Z™ product in reducing and or removing these 10 toxic compounds. This 90-day study involving three test subjects demonstrated that MasterPeace™ Zeolite Z™ safely and effectively reduced the toxic levels of these 10 toxins. The study’s objectives have been met, confirming the efficacy of MasterPeace™
Zeolite Z™ detoxifying capabilities. Therefore, in depth quantitative analysis has yielded objective measurements confirming that MasterPeace™ Zeolite Z™ is a safe and effective chelator and remover of toxic micro and nano forever chemicals, heavy metals, micro plastics, aluminum and graphene oxidefound in human body cells and fluids.
Strengths and Limitations
Strengths: One of the key strengths of this study lies in the use of the intracellular blood toxicity test,[11] which provides insights into genotoxic, cytotoxic and bio-magnetic toxic substances that are typically difficult for individuals and clinicians to access. Importantly, this pilot study has been a valuable eye-opener, revealing significant levels of micro and nano toxicity within the test subjects.
Another notable strength is the significant reduction in micro and nano toxin levels observed over the relatively short period of 90 days, with all test subjects showing a decrease from very high and high ranges to borderline and tolerable ranges as seen in Chart 7 and Chart 8 for all 10 toxic substances tested.
Chart 7
Chart 8
Limitations: The primary limitations of this study include the small sample size, which is inherent in pilot studies, and the short duration of three months. Additionally, the study sample consisted of only three subjects of similar age, which may limit the generalizability of the findings. Further research with a larger and more diverse sample size over a longer period is necessary to validate these initial results.
Implications for Practice: The findings of this study suggest that the MasterPeace™ Zeolite™ formulation by Human Consciousness Support™ company, specifically the Zeolite Z™ formulation, demonstrated promising detoxification treatment for reducing high levels of 10 known toxic micro and nano foreign and toxic substances found in the human body cells and fluids.
These results warrant further research with larger and more diverse populations, which could potentially lead to its incorporation into clinical practices around the world for managing and reducing toxic chemical and heavy metal loads in the blood and body cells of humans.
Conclusion
Summary of Findings: In summary, the study demonstrated that the MasterPeace™ Zeolite Z™ formulation manufactured by Human Consciousness Support™ company, specifically the Zeolite Z™ with colloidal sea minerals, effectively reduced high levels of toxic micro and nano chemical and heavy metal particulates without any negative side-effects.
The 10 known chemical and heavy metal toxic micro and nano compounds and elements in the blood of all three test subjects over a 90-day period, with all participants: toxin levels were shown to decrease from very high and high ranges to borderline and tolerable ranges shown in the charts above.
Clinical Relevance: These findings suggest that MasterPeace™ Zeolite Z™ manufactured by Human
Consciousness Support™ company, with its Zeolite Z™ formulation, holds promise as a beneficial nutraceutical for enhancing health and wellness by reducing the toxic burdens in the human body cells and fluids. Further research could explore its potential role in clinical practice for detoxification and improving overall health outcomes.
Future Research: A current ongoing 24-cohort study, which includes a control placebo double-blind design and investigates 27 genotoxic, cytotoxic and bio magnetic toxic compounds, aims to further build on the findings of this pilot study. This larger-scale research initiative will provide more comprehensive data on the efficacy of the MasterPeace™ Zeolite Z™ formulation manufactured by Human Support Consciousness™ company for the expressed purpose of detoxifying the human body cells and fluids and could potentially validate its clinical utility in broader populations.
Acknowledgments
Contributions: IGL-Labor GmbH, Epigenetics and Biochemical Laboratory. Statistical charts and graphs done by Anders Brundstad
Funding: The study was funded by Human Consciousness Support™ Company
Conflicts: There are no known conflicts
How Can I Lean More About MasterPeace Zeolite Z?
Here is the link to set up your free account so you can order MasterPeace Zeolite Z and share with all your friends and family!
You Shall Know the Truth and the Truth Shall Set You Free
References
[1] Mastinu A, Kumar A, Maccarinelli G, Bonni SA, Premoli M, Aria F, Gianoncelli A, Memo M. “Zeolite Clinopitolite: ‘Therapeutic Virtues of an Ancient Mineral’”, Molecules. 2019 Apr; 24(8): 1517.
Published online 2019 Apr 17. doi: 10.3390/molecules24081517. PMCID: PMC6515299. PMID: 30999685
[2] Kraljević Pavelić S., Simović Medica J., Gumbarević D., Filošević A., Pržulj N., Pavelić K. Critical Review on Zeolite Clinoptilolite Safety and Medical Applications in vivo. Front. Pharmacol. 2018;9:1350. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2018.01350.
[3] Young RO (May 27, 2016). “Colloids and Colloidal Systems in Human Health and Nutrition”. Int J Complement Alt Med 3(6): 00095. DOI: 10.15406/ijcam.2016.03.00095
[4] Lee BH, Yang AR, Kim MY, McCurdy S, Boisvert WA. Natural sea salt consumption confers protection against hypertension and kidney damage in Dahl salt-sensitive rats. Food Nutr Res. 2016 Dec 20;61(1):1264713. doi: 10.1080/16546628.2017.1264713. Erratum in: Food Nutr Res. 2017 Mar 20;61(1):1300375. doi: 10.1080/16546628.2017.1300375. PMID: 28325999; PMCID: PMC5328355.
[5] Human Consciousness Support website at: https://masterpeacebyhcs.com/
[6] Velarde L., Nabavi M.S., Escalera E., Lena Antti L,, Akhtar F. “Adsorption of heavy metals on natural zeolites: A review”, Chemosphere, Volume 328, 2023, 138508, ISSN 0045-6535,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.138508.
[7] Hedayati, M.S., Nicomel, N.R., Abida, O. et al. Removal of perfluoroalkyl acids from aqueous media by surfactant-modified clinoptilolites. Environ Sci Pollut Res 31, 16915–16927 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-024-32194-4
[8] Munir, N., Javaid, A., Abideen, Z. et al. The potential of zeolite nanocomposites in removing microplastics, ammonia, and trace metals from wastewater and their role in phytoremediation. Environ Sci Pollut Res 31, 1695–1718 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-31185-1
[9] Young, RO, “Oxygenated Zeolite (Clinoptilite) Efficiently Removes Aluminum & Graphene Oxide”. https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/oxygenated-zeolite-clinoptilolite-efficiently-removes-aluminum-graphene-oxide. April 2024
[10] Sandra Kraljević Pavelić, Vedran Micek, Ana Filošević, Darko Gumbarević, Paula Žurga, Aleksandar Bulog, Tatjana Orct, Yasuaki Yamamoto, Tajana Preočanin, Janez Plavec, Robert Peter, Mladen Petravić, Dražen Vikić-Topić, Krešimir Pavelić. “Novel, oxygenated clinoptilolite material efficiently removes aluminium from aluminium chloride-intoxicated rats in vivo”. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, Volume 249, 2017, Pages 146-156, ISSN 1387-1811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2017.04.062.(https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1387181117303116)
[11] IGL-Labor GmbH, Epigenetics and Biochemical Laboratory, Germany. https://www.igl-labor.de/en/about-us/our-laboratory
[12] Pavelić K, Kraljević Pavelić S. Zeolites in Medicine: Current Achievements and Research of Zeolites in Medicine. New York, NY: Nova Science Publishers; (2019)
[13] Kraljević Pavelić S, Simović Medica J, Gumbarević D, Filošević A, Pržulj N, Pavelić K. Critical review on zeolite clinoptilolite safety and medical applications in vivo. Front Pharmacol. (2018) 9:1350. 10.3389/fphar.2018.01350
[14] Pavelić K, Hadžija M. Medical application of zeolites. In: Auerbach S, Carrado K, Dutta P. editors. Handbook of Zeolite Sciences and Technology. New York, NY: Marcel Dekker, Inc; (2003). p. 1143–74.
[15] T.M. Cogan, in Encyclopedia of Dairy Sciences (Second Edition), 2011. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/immunology-and-microbiology/oxidation-reduction-potential
[16] Schlesinger O., Alfonta L., in Methods in Enzymology, 2018. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/chemistry/graphene-oxide
[17] M.C. Hacker, A.G. Mikos, in Principles of Regenerative Medicine (Second Edition), 2011. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/agricultural-and-biological-sciences/polyethylene
[18] Calhoun A,, in Multilayer Flexible Packaging, 2010. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/chemistry/poly-propylene
[19] Zahm S, Bonde JP, Chiu WA, Hoppin J, Kanno J, Abdallah M, et al. (November 2023). "Carcinogenicity of perfluorooctanoic acid and perfluorooctanesulfonic acid". The Lancet. Oncology. 25 (1): 16–17. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(23)00622-8. PMID 38043561. S2CID 265571186
[20] Per- and Polyfluorinated Substances (PFAS) Factsheet | National Biomonitoring Program | CDC". www.cdc.gov. 2022-05-03. Retrieved 2024-04-1
[21] Record of Perfluorooctanoic acid in the GESTIS Substance Database of the Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, accessed on 5 November
[22] Prevedouros K, Cousins IT, Buck RC, Korzeniowski SH (January 2006). "Sources, fate and transport of perfluorocarboxylates". Environ. Sci. Technol. 40 (1): 32–44. Bibcode:2006EnST...40...32P. doi:10.1021/es0512475. PMID 16433330.
[23] Gad S.C., in Encyclopedia of Toxicology (Third Edition), 2014. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/chemistry/aluminum
[24] Baer K.N., Marcel B.J., in Encyclopedia of Toxicology (Third Edition), 2014. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/chemistry/glyphosate
[25] Das S., Chitta, Patra C.R., in Handbook of Greener Synthesis of Nanomaterials and Compounds, 2021. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/chemistry/iron
[26] Shaw I., in Pesticide Chemistry and Bioscience, 1999. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/agricultural-and-biological-sciences/lindane
[27] Gad S.C., in Encyclopedia of Toxicology (Third Edition), 2014. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/chemistry/phosgene
[28] Young, R.O., “Scanning and Transmission Electron Microscopy Reveals Graphene Oxide in CoV-19 Vaccines". Acta Scientific Medical Sciences 6.8 (2022): 98-111. https://typeset.io/pdf/scanning-and-transmission-electron-microscopy-reveals-qzxx2mpu.pdf
[29] Hwa Yun B, Guo J, Bellamri M, Turesky RJ. DNA adducts: Formation, biological effects, and new biospecimens for mass spectrometric measurements in humans. Mass Spectrom Rev. 2020 Mar;39(1-2):55-82. doi: 10.1002/mas.21570. Epub 2018 Jun 11. PMID: 29889312; PMCID: PMC6289887.
My hope is that you will take the time to read, ponder, meditate and pray about the life changing and life saving intelligence I have shared with you today.
All the very best of health, fitness and vitality.
Robert O Young MSc, DSc, PhD, Naturopathic Practitioner
Website - www.drrobertyoung.com
Commissioner International Tribunal of Natural Justice - https://newearthproject.org/initiative/international-tribunal-for-natural-justice/
Editorial Board Member of ACTA Scientific Medical Sciences - https://www.actascientific.com/ASMS.php
Fellow at the New Earth University - https://newearth.university/members/dr-robert-o-young-cpt-msc-dsc-phd/
Scientific Blog - www.drrobertyoung.com/blog
Scientific Articles Wordpress - https://phoreveryoung.wordpress.com/
Youtube Videos - https://www.yo2utube.com/c/RobertYoung555/playlists
Rumble Videos - https://rumble.com/user/DrRobertYoung
Bitchute Videos - https://www.bitchute.com/channel/O9BGTIwnNo5s/
Odysee Videos - https://odysee.com/@DrRobertYoung:7
Brighteon Videos - https://www.brighteon.com/channels/drrobertyoung
pH Miracle Retreats - www.phmriacleretreat.com
World Premier Documentary Thrive 2 - https://www.bitchute.com/video/ubk5RQF5Pe26/
Mammograms - The War on Womens Breasts - https://youtu.be/gC8H27P22cc
Books by Dr. Robert O Young - www.phmiracleproducts.com and https://www.amazon.com/kindle-dbs/entity/author/B001ILKCSU?_encoding=UTF8&node=283155&offset=0&pageSize=12&searchAlias=stripbooks&sort=author-sidecar-rank&page=1&langFilter=default#formatSelectorHeader
Instagram - https://www.instagram.com/drrobertyoung/
Twitter - @phmiraclelife
Telegram - https://t.me/DrRobertOYoungNews
Help Support the research of Dr. Robert O. Young
Want to Learn More?
Remember Education NOT Medication! - Education NOT Vaccination!
From Terminal Cancer to Courage and a Self-Cure -
Dr. Robert O. Young & T.M. Ballantyne, Jr. New Book Releases
Three New Truth vs. Deception Books
To donate to the research of Dr. Robert O Young go to:www.givesendgo.com/G2Z76
Follow Dr Robert O Young on twitter:Robert Young DSc, PhD, Naturopathic Practitioner@phmiraclelife
"All the information presented in the following research articles were authored by Dr. Robert O. Young and are impressive" Mission Possible
"Scanning & Transmission Electron Microscopy Reveals Graphene & Parasites in CoV-19 Vaccines", peer-reviewed and reviewed by millions around the World:
The following are the pdf files in English and in Spanish for the above scientific article for which you can share with everyone you love and care about:
"Nano and Micro Graphene & Parasites Causing Blood Clots Seen in the Blood of the VAXXed & UNVAXXed!"
This 28-page PDF attachment below by Dr. Robert Young is very impressive.
Dr. Young has presented the facts in his research and included microscopic photos of visible particles and able to identify them. Things that should never ever be injected into the human body. Just look at the non-disclosed ingredients on the list he compiled that is within this document.
These falsely claimed so-called vaccines from the four major pharmaceutical companies were analyzed by Dr. Young:
Pfizer/BioNTech (“Pfizer”); Moderna/Lonza mRNA-1273 (“Moderna”); Vaxzevria by AstraZeneca (“AstraZeneca”); and Janssen by Johnson & Johnson (“Janssen”).
If humanity had known what was being injected into their bodies and even their children’s body they would had never taken this toxic COVID bioweapon?
I would think not unless they were a “few bricks shy a full load” or wanted themselves suicided, sacrificing themselves and their children on the altar of Big Pharma.
Forcing or coercion of a child into taking this injection is absolute child abuse and unintentional or intentional attempted murder.
Some are saying there is no graphene oxide in the weaponized COVID-19 injections of the vial and blood. Following in the steps of the government funded “FACT CHECKERS”, with their propaganda of the real “Misinformation.”
You will see actual microscopy pictures captured in that article published on August 20, 2021, and republished again on January 19, 2023. Nothing has changed in the past 17 months.
"Dr. Young’s research will prove to you that there is indeed “graphene oxide” and "parasites" in the COVID serum."
It seems since the rollout of these injections, some well-intended doctors and scientist are far behind of the research by Dr. Young and other true deep researchers like La Quinta Columna. La Ouinta Columa researchers, for whom I have also been following three years, found toxic nanometallic content which are magneticotoxic, cytotoxic and genotoxic to plants, insects, birds, animals, and humans, all life on the planet, which was confirmed by Dr. Young and his team of researchers. Even life-threatening parasites were discovered in one of the “vaccines”.
The “vaccine” components including graphene oxide among many others are which influenced by radiation sources external to us can create a toxic chemical and radiative soup inside our bodies (Published By The Liberty Beacon) from the Covid bioweapon has put people’s lives at risk.
Many will, as I have been saying in my opinion, will die from radiation poison by this injection with graphene oxide, the hydrogel with the insertion of Cesium-137 for the individuals bodies injected with these ingredients to absorb the microwave radiation 5G communications frequencies for tracking, manipulating the mind, and even transmit the frequencies of diseases of compromised destroyed immune systems leading to permanent disability and death.
To go into more detail, you need to understand something very important in this discussion of graphene oxide. Then you will understand why it was so important to produce this warp speed COVID-19 bioweapon, and its connection with the lightning speed of installing 5G cell towers on school roofs, cell towers on grounds in city and rual areas, and 5G weaponized streetlights with 5G WIFI transmitters.
Besides using this bioweapon injected to cause mass permanently disabilities and even maximize the death potential, graphene oxide which has an electrical charge and hydrogel with the insertion of cesium-137 as revealed by Todd Callender, and the self-replicating and self-construction of nano particles and nanotubes to construct an internal WIFI system to communicate with the individual’s body with 5G microwave radiation frequencies. Without the ingredients of graphene oxide, the hydrogel, and the Cesium-137 this would not be possible. This is exactly one of the many ingredients that have been undeclared in the bioweapon COVID-19 serum injections.
This is the very reason these 'bad actors' were introducing this new, experimental injection, that was never about viral protection, but as Moderna’s website said they were injecting the software of life like a computer system with “plug and play” capabilities like in a computer system. They have or are setting up a way to track those who have been injected who can be controlled by AI with the microwave radiation frequencies.
About 6 years ago, I learned that they have the frequencies of various viruses, as I have already mentioned, for which they can transmit into those that have the injection with the “software of life” any virus frequency to incapacitate or kill one. A cause of death that would be very hard to identify.
Many of these frequencies were discovered by Royal Rife years ago and were no doubt confiscated by the government military, and no doubt also involving DARPA, as was Tesla’s inventions that would have made it possible for US energy independence. FREE ENERGY!
It is my assumption that once the 5G cell towers are fully installed and activated in large, metropolitan areas, that due to the powerful microwave beams coming from every direction possible, will lead to death by radiation poisoning from the microwave oven everyone will be living in. But there again, it will also be covered up as death by a COVID to pacify those wearing their tin foil hats and mask.
With every COVID inoculation injection going in, the toxic substances keep accumulating in the body, gradually destroying the natural innate immune system leading to an early death of what the globalist consider them, as Henry Kissinger called them, “Useless Eaters.”
Part of Bill Gates TED conference talk in 2011 was where he alluded to the decreasing world population and said: “Now if we do a real good job with healthcare and vaccines, we could reduce the population by 10 to 15 percent.” Well, if you take 8-billion people times 15% you get 1-billion, 2 hundred million eliminated by the healthcare system and vaccines.
But, Bill Gates plan appears that it will exceed his expectations as scientist are predicting the deaths of 2 billion in the next two years and more billions following. A prediction of millions dying from myocarditis and pericarditis alone is projected. All being planned as part of the globalist depopulation agenda to come to fruition by 2025 per www.degeal.com funded as in a screen capture on their website pictured here:
The Deagel corporation is a minor branch of US military intelligence, one of the many secretive organizations which collects data for high-level decision-making purposes and prepares confidential briefing documents for agencies like the National Security Agency, the United Nations, and the World Bank.
It is known, for example, to have contributed to a Stratfor report on North Korea. With this kind of pedigree, Deagel should be seen as a legitimate player in the intelligence community and not merely a disinformation asset.
If so, then it must be assumed that its population predictions for 2025, as well as its industrial output predictions on a nation-by-nation basis, are based on strategic assumptions which are shared and well understood by other players in the intelligence community.
Deagel.com’s [infamous] 2025 forecast was removed from their website sometime in 2020. The content is reproduced here for your reference and educational purposes.
Robert O Young MSc, DSc, PhD, Naturopathic Practitionerwww.drrobertyoung.com
Follow Dr. Robert O. Young on Twitter at: https://twitter.com/phmiraclelife
You can support the research of Dr. Robert O. Young with your prayers and donations at: https://www.givesendgo.com/research
Follow Dr. Robert O. Young on Twitter at: https://twitter.com/phmiraclelife
https://rumble.com/v18ku7h-5g-radiation-poisoning-combined-with-graphene-poisoning-of-the-blood.html
Understand Why Blood Clots Form Inside the Blood Vessels!
Read Dr. Robert O. Young's Peered Review Scientific Research Article Published in the International Journal of Vaccines and Vaccination on Pathological Blood Coagulation! (2016)
Pathological Blood Coagulation and the Mycotoxic Oxidative Stress Testing, Young RO (2016) Pathological Blood Coagulation and the Mycotoxic Oxidative Stress Test (MOST). Int J Vaccines Vaccin 2(6): 00048. DOI: 10.15406/ijvv.2016.02.00048
Here are two links to learn more on how to protect your organs, glands, tissues, including your heart, liver, lungs, brain and reproductive organs from lipo nano graphene with Spike Protein attached.
1. https://redemperorcbd.com/product/live-dried-blood-analysis-basic-advance-home-test/?ref=youngblood
The following links will take you to the peer reviewed article for CBDA and CBGA and the protection you need against the VAXXXed Spike Protein from foreign animal and human sources.
"According to the American Heart Association over 50 percent vaxxed will die within the next 5 years!"
hey Doc Robert
Thank you. Consciousness is seeing All to -get her. Appreciate you for helpin* us do this.
just finished celery and Master Peace.
Here s to you and your health.
Thank you for your service.
ScottB
👍🏻✌️